In recent years, advances to additive manufacturing hardware and software in LPBF have led to faster print speeds, greater consistency, and scalability, all of which have evolved the technology from a prototyping solution to an industrial production process. Even as AM has evolved, however, many in the industry have felt that its potential has been limited by downstream processes, such as part cleaning and finishing.

In metal AM, for instance, metal powder removal, a critical step in making viable industrial components, was for years recognized as a bottleneck due to its reliance on manual processes and increased complexity relative to part design. Fortunately, this is changing thanks to the emergence of automated powder removal solutions, such as Solukon’s SFM systems.

These systems, which rely on CAD data and smart algorithms to automate and optimize powder removal, are changing the landscape for metal AM post-processing. Still, these solutions are only part (albeit a big part) of the journey to truly scalable, efficient powder removal. As we’ll see, manufacturers can also implement design and pre-printing strategies to improve powder removal and enhance their production workflows.

A new era of automated powder removal

The importance of effective powder removal for 3D printed parts can’t be overstated. After parts are removed from the powder bed, loose, unsintered particles can still cling to the surface of a part as well as get trapped in cavities, channels, and other design features. Not only does this powder pose safety risks to operators, it can also have a negative impact on part surface finish, tolerances, and overall performance if not removed.

In the early years of powder bed fusion technologies, depowdering was largely dependent on manual processes, including vacuuming, brushing, air blasting, and knocking. This approach was time intensive, even requiring hours for a single part, and came with significant health and safety risks.

Automated powder removal solutions like Solukon’s SFM systems have therefore been a welcome innovation in the AM industry. By combining hardware featuring programmable two-axis rotation and targeted vibrations with sophisticated software solutions, namely SPR-Pathfinder, Solukon has introduced a depowdering approach that is fast, automated, and based on part design.

“Customers consistently share that automated depowdering fundamentally improves the reliability and efficiency of their post-processing workflows,” explained Sebastian Becker, Head of Product Management Metal at 3D printing solutions provider EOS, a longstanding partner and customer of Solukon. “When Solukon systems are used in combination with EOS platforms, they enable a stable and predictable transition from printing to downstream steps. Automated rotation and vibration remove powder even from highly complex geometries, significantly reducing manual labor, operator exposure, and the variability associated with manual cleaning.”

At aerospace company Sòphia High Tech S.r.l., Solukon’s powder removal solutions have also played an important role in streamlining the production of metal parts optimized for fuel efficiency. As Nicola Sicignano, AM Specialist at Sòphia High Tech explains: “Compared to manual methods such as compressed air flushing, the automated system guarantees higher accuracy and repeatability. This reduces the risk of contamination in subsequent steps such as part removal from the build plate, washing, and heat treatment. In addition, operating in an inert environment enables safe powder recovery and reuse, improving both material efficiency and overall process sustainability.”

Optimal powder removal starts at part design

While automated depowdering solutions have been a game-changer for industrial AM, their efficiency can be further maximized by strategic decisions made upstream of the printing process. In the design stage engineers can already start making certain choices with depowdering in mind.

Typically, the more complex a part, the harder it can be to remove powder. Features like long internal channels with narrow diameters, interconnected cavities, lattice structures, and high-aspect ratios can introduce depowdering challenges. That said, AM’s ability to produce such complex structures for industries like aerospace, energy, and medical, is a key reason the technology is used. The answer to more effective depowdering therefore can’t just be simpler part geometries; informed design choices must be made.

“Design decisions made early in the process have a significant impact on depowdering possibilities and efficiency,” said Sebastian Becker from EOS. “Factors such as build orientation, channel diameter, drainage angles, and the placement of escape holes all influence how easily powder can be removed.”

“Adopting a Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) approach is key,” Sicignano adds. “This includes optimizing geometries for easier depowdering, using simulation tools to predict powder flow and potential trapping areas, and defining standardized design rules for internal channels.”

Solukon’s SPR-Pathfinder software is such a simulation tool, enhancing how users integrate powder removal strategies at the design stage. The software uses powder behavior simulation to choreograph movements and vibrations based on part geometry. This means that users can input the CAD file of the build job into the software before printing begins, and generate an optimized motion sequence for the powder removal process. This simulation enables users to establish if the powder removal process will be efficient for a given geometry or whether steps can be taken to facilitate depowdering, such as making design adjustments. In SPR-Pathfinder users can immediately detect critical zones within the part, that need to be adjusted for a better depowdering result.

Other strategies for improved powder removal

Aside from design considerations, there are other ways to improve depowdering ahead of the printing process. In the print preparation stage, for example, factors like part orientation and support generation can have a significant impact on the volume of powder that must be removed and how easily parts can be cleaned. Other parameters, such as gas-flow management can also contribute to cleaner parts and powder removal efficiency.

“Improvements can be made across the entire process chain,” Becker elaborates. “Some EOS customers optimize printing parameters to reduce powder adhesion, while advanced gas‑flow management and continuously improved process parameters help keep part surfaces smoother during the build process. Additionally, EOS installs technologies that reduce support structures to further increase powder‑removal efficiency.”

Two key considerations to keep in mind are:

• Minimizing supports to reduce volume of loose powder and removal requirements
• Strategic part orientation to facilitate gravity-based powder removal and minimal powder buildup

Further downstream, combining automated powder removal systems with closed-loop powder handling solutions can also increase the overall efficiency of the additive manufacturing process. Solukon’s SFM systems in particular facilitate powder recovery and ensure that recovered powders are contamination free. This, as Sicignano puts it, “improves both material efficiency and overall process sustainability. The result is a more reliable workflow, reduced manual intervention, and improved final part quality.”

Conclusion

Vital post-processing steps like depowdering are no longer the bottleneck they once were and can keep reaching new levels of efficiency through a combination of automated solutions and upstream design strategies.

Driven by smart simulation tools, Solukon’s advanced powder removal solutions enable manufacturers to evaluate powder removal for specific designs before production begins. This capability presents a paradigm shift for depowdering, where design is not only an early consideration for the post-process but is actually simulated and validated prior to printing. For end users, this intelligent approach makes efficient, scalable production possible, while reducing the risk of producing parts that stall workflows or fail due to depowdering issues.

As Nicola Sicignano, from Solukon customer Sophia High Tech concludes: “Ultimately, combining optimized design practices with advanced automated depowdering technologies delivers the best results in terms of efficiency, safety, and final part quality.”

Internal channels, lattice structures, and conformal cooling circuits are signature capabilities of metal additive manufacturing. They deliver major advantages for aerospace, medical, and automotive applications, but they also make depowdering far more demanding. Depowdering, the step where residual metal powder is removed from a printed part, is often where that complexity becomes most acute.

Which metal AM processes require depowdering?

Automated depowdering is primarily required for powder-bed metal AM processes, where parts are built fully immersed in fine metal powder. The three main processes concerned are SLM/DMLS (Selective Laser Melting / Direct Metal Laser Sintering) commonly known as LPBF, EBM (Electron Beam Melting), and metal binder jetting.

In metal binder jetting, the “green” part must be carefully depowdered before sintering, as any residual powder directly affects final part density and dimensional accuracy.

For parts in these processes, especially those featuring closed channels, fine lattices, or overhanging structures, manual depowdering is slow, inconsistent, and becomes a bottleneck that undermines the entire value proposition of AM.

In SLM and DMLS, parts are fully embedded in the powder bed and complex geometries trap powder inside internal cavities. EBM follows a similar logic, with the added challenge that powder is partially sintered during the process, making manual removal particularly difficult.

While EBM presents some of the most compelling cases for automated depowdering, the partially sintered, fragile structure of green parts makes it technically challenging. Solukon‘s current solutions are designed for LPBF and SLS (with a focus on LPBF depowdering), where the structural integrity of parts allows for reliable automated handling.

What happens when depowdering is incomplete?

In general, automated depowdering is required because it:

First, trapped powder: fine metal powder lodged in internal channels or cavities cannot always be dislodged by standard means. In closed or semi-closed geometries, it may be virtually impossible to remove without a dedicated, programmable process.

Second, contamination: residual powder from one build or one alloy can migrate into subsequent processes, compromising material traceability.

Third, porosity: when trapped powder undergoes partial sintering during heat treatment or HIP, it can create unintended voids within the part microstructure, directly degrading mechanical performance (strength, fatigue life, and pressure tightness) often in ways that are invisible without CT scanning or destructive testing.

These three risks are interconnected. One failure point cascades into the next.

Why is depowdering harder for aerospace, medical, and automotive parts?

The answer lies in geometry, material, and consequences. The parts that benefit most from metal AM (rocket thrust chambers, fuel system manifolds, hydraulic components, patient-specific implants, lightweight structural brackets) are also the hardest to depowder. Their materials (titanium, aluminum) demand inert atmospheres during handling. And their end-use environments leave no margin for residual contamination or microstructural defects.

For aerospace, a blocked internal channel in a fuel or cooling component is a safety event. In medical, a part that carries residual powder into sterilization or implantation fails regulatory requirements. In automotive, where serial production is now a real ambition for AM, inconsistent depowdering breaks the repeatability that volume manufacturing demands.

These industries are also the ones pushing the boundaries of part and/or batch size.

Where does Solukon come in?

Solukon Maschinenbau GmbH has been engineering automated depowdering systems since 2015.

What sets Solukon apart is the combination of programmable two-axis rotation, controlled inert atmospheres for reactive materials, and the SPR-Pathfinder® software, which automatically calculates the optimal motion sequence from the part’s CAD file.

When the part cannot afford to fail, the depowdering process cannot afford to be approximate.

The biggest industrial 3D printing event in the US is around the corner. Learn what we will show at booth 1435 in Boston, MA this year.

Automated powder removal has been an established part of industrial 3D printing for more than a decade. But what will 2026 bring? Which trends are already beginning to take shape? We look ahead.

Powder removal using ultrasound

Cleaning components with ultra-high-frequency excitation has established itself as an effective alternative to conventional pneumatic excitation. Around two years ago, Solukon introduced the first series-production system featuring ultrasonic excitation.

Delivering excellent cleaning results, including for customers such as justairtech and The Exploration Company, this new excitation method has clearly proven its value. As a result, interest in ultrasonic solutions continues to grow, with an increasing number of enquiries from the market.

These are the advantages of ultrasonic depowdering:

1. Particularly gentle cleaning

Piezoelectric excitation is applied directly to the turntable of the automated depowdering system, setting the component into optimal vibration with exceptional precision and minimal effort.

A key advantage of ultrasonic excitation is its variable frequency. Rather than operating at a single fixed frequency, the system continuously and rapidly cycles through a defined frequency range in which cleaning is most effective. This so-called sweeping process ensures highly reliable powder removal by targeting precisely controlled ultrasonic frequencies.

Because these ultra-high excitation frequencies are well above the component’s potentially harmful natural frequency, unwanted resonance is avoided. This prevents excessive vibration and protects the part from damage. As a result, automated ultrasonic depowdering is an especially gentle cleaning method, making it ideally suited for delicate structures such as lattice or sponge-like geometries used in medical technology.

2. Silent cleaning process

This can be a decisive advantage, particularly in otherwise noisy production environments: ultrasonic cleaning operates virtually silently.

3. Reliable loosening of powder clumps

Powder clumps may form inside components during the printing process as a result of moisture or insufficient excitation. This issue occurs most frequently in long, narrow internal channels. Ultrasonic excitation reliably breaks up and removes these clumps.

Formnext time is the most exciting of the year. Learn what we will show at the world’s biggest event for industrial 3D printing in Frankfurt, Germany.

SHORT CUT: WHAT WE HAVE AT DISPLAY

• Special version of the SFM-AT800-S with automated part transport and robotic finishing
• SFM-AT350-E: Gentle and silent depowdering with ultrasonics

We’re celebrating our 10th anniversary this year. As part of the occasion, we asked our customers and partners 10 questions about Solukon.

Here is a selection of their responses. Enjoy reading!